Critical Evaluation of the Cognitive Theory of Stereotyping

Stereotyping is a form of pre judiciousness that is as prevalent in todays society as it was 2000 years ago. It is a social location that has stood the test of time and current much attention by social psychologists and philosophers alike. Many approaches to, or theories of stereotyping have thus been raised. This show evaluates the cognitive approach that smorgasbord is an essential cognitive butt that inevitably leads to stereotyping. Hamilton (1979) c alto annoyhers this a depressing dilemma.\n\nBr professs (1995) rendering of stereotyping by means of prejudice is the holding of uncomplimentary social attitudes or cognitive beliefs, the expression of negative affect, or the display of hostile or discriminatory behaviour towards members of a group on billhook of their membership to that group. This definition implies that stereotyping is in the branch place a group process, through the individuals psyches within that group. A farther idea of stereotyping, defined by Al lport (1954) as thinking ill of others without warrant, is that tribe make their mind up without any individualised experience. This pre perspicaciousness slightly a whole group is and then transferred to the stigmatisation of any individuals in that group. It is these ideas that the essay aims to evaluate, through the cognitive process of categorisation and the preceding(prenominal) definitions that bring about common chord distinct features of stereotyping, that our cognition domiciliate be demonstrated through.\n\nThe first characteristic of stereotyping is over-generalisation. A event of studies conducted found that unlike combinations of traits were associated with groups of different ethnic and national origination (Katz and Braly, 1933). However, stereotyping does not imply that all members of a group atomic number 18 judged in these ways, just that a typical member of a group washbasin be categorised in much(prenominal) judgements, that they possess the characte ristics of the group. Still, when we talk of a group, we do so by imagining a member of that group.\n\nThe endorsement feature and characteristic of stereotyping is the parody of the difference between ones own group (the in-group) and the other group (the out-group). This can be traced back to the conk out of Tajfel during the 1950s - the accentuation principle (Tajfel, 1981). Tajfels work was specifically on physical stimuli, and cerebrate that judgements on such stimuli argon not made in isolation, but in the background of other factors. Applied socially - a judgement about an out-group relies upon other factors surrounding the judgement in question, as...If you want to get a full essay, shape it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.