.

Sunday, September 24, 2017

'Scientists in the 16th and 17th Centuries'

'Scientists and their croak underwent an ontogeny equal to artists of the Renaissance, during the scientific Revolution of the sixteenth and 17th centuries. Scientists such(prenominal) as Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Isaac normality proved to be influential and revolutionary. The work of the aforementioned scientists was two positively and negatively affected by the social, political, and religious factors of the time. During the sixteenth and 17th centuries, the church service had great avow over erudition, in particular ideas that would oppose the teachings of the Bible. Copernicus was ostracized for his heliocentric model, and as a result in a by and by publication Copernicus writes to pontiff Paul III, It is to your sanctitude rather than to anyone else that I take on elect to dedicate these studies of mine ( doctor 1). Copernicus views the pope as very powerful, thus Copernicus writes this to gain the Popes financial backing in range for his work to b e more successful. This depicts how the Catholic Church negatively affected these scientists because Copernicus had to gruntle the Pope to read sure he was not attacked. regular off when scientists appeased to the Pope, local clergymen were even more battleful in their attacks on scientists. As seen in Doc 3., Giovanni Ciampoli, an Italian monk, writes angrily to Galileo, It is indispensable, therefore, to pip the possibility of malignant rumors by repeatedly showing your willingness to slacken to the authority of those who have jurisdiction over the human intellect, in matters of the interpretation of Scripture. This text file shows the true, unfiltered attitude of clergymen towards scientists because distant the Pope, Giovanni did not remove to seem politically correct when writing to Galileo, he could truly speak his mind. Doc 3 in addition illustrates how religion, on a larger scale, could negatively affect and jibe the work of scientists. This direct of control i s represent by scientists who unruffled based science on r... '

No comments:

Post a Comment