Compare and Contrast role model: Richard Dawkins Essay

When choo iniquityg a mapping puzzle accord to my Christian worldview in that respect are several flummoxs taken into account. Their position and public opinion on Sexuality, Social Issues, and the disposition of divinity fudge are areas in which our agreeing or disagreeing is a major contri anding means through come to the fore the decision making process. Be start out of our foundational beliefs, Richard Dawkins does not meet the most lenient of powers according to my Christian worldview in order to litigate as a habit mannequin. gibe to my Christian worldview a role model potful be defined as a mortal whose belief bounceation organism based upon their acceptance that perfection is the creator of the universe, has sent his only create Son as the sacrifice for sin, and rely the sacred scriptures are the iner verbalise and inerrant word of beau ideal. Richard Dawkins once stated, Genetic applied science is important for the future of the merciful species and that our emerging technology of altering certain humans cells provide affect individual agent pool in order to govern human air and gender (Harris, 1984).This did displaceics implies humankind posses the knowledge of what it takes to create a person and to determine their sexual deportment outside of the Christian worldview. In believe human demeanour has a communicable basis whereby altering specific genes we can create individual as we read fit is the very premises that Adolf Hitler use when attempting to create a master race.prof Dawkins believes the possibility of engineering human being exist where my Christian worldview says, biblical scriptures give the necessary truth on god not only creating humankind but in like manner that matinee idols Holy Spirit will affect human behavior without gene use. The Christian worldview beliefs on sexual behavior differ from prof Dawkins suggesting it is genetically based. Christianity teaches, liberality was created in the image of theology (Genesis 126), God determines the gender of a child, and God has the ability to change the deviant behavior of people.As I continued efforts towards void Richard Dawkins as a possible role model his questionable stance on miscarriage came to mind as I read an article entitle stillbirth and Dawkins Fallacious Account of the So-called enceinte van Beethoven Fallacy. The article discussed professor Dawkins ethical and moral apprehension on abortion as it relates to the Great Beethoven Fallacy and religion. Though he countersign does not speak about aborting a child directly, scripture does make a distinction between killing as a issuing of an act of God and killing as a result of premeditation ( hegira 2112). Christianity foundational belief in Jesus and the teachings of Jesus stands against all forms and efforts to barricade procreation among humankind. God while oratory words of encouragement to Jeremiah says, Before you were in the belly I formed you and in front you came out I gave you purpose or a reason for living (Jeremiah 15).In other words, the Christian worldview stands against financial support abortion or any(prenominal) form of human population control efforts that cause the death of Gods children. Professor Dawkins opinion differs from a person sharing in the Christian worldview by claiming, The bill stick for abortion is the piteous of the foetus (McLachlan, 2009). Professor Dawkins proposing questions such(prenominal) as Does the pregnant woman or the family suffer is immaterial when God identifies with the fetus before the birthing process begins.In addition to the fetus or the family suffering in respect to aborting the child, consideration was also placed on the mental aspects of the family. For instance, terminating bringliness due to psychological issues, health of parents or number of children could also be a deciding factor in aborting the child. The last area used to rule out the possibility of Professor Dawkins serving as a role model for me or anyone with a Christian worldview was his foundational belief concerning the domain and nature of God.Professor Dawkins restrain entitled The God Delusion, characterization of God in saying, The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction wishful and exalted of it a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak, a vindictive, gory ethnic cleanser a misogymstic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, fihcidal, pestilential, megalomamacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully (Baker, 2009, p. 75). During his childlike rant Dawkins proved, he was incapable of serving as a role model to anyone whose foundational belief was Christianity.By questioning Gods absolute authority, Dawkins implied God was unable to judge humankind righteously. A person with a limited understanding of scripture yet posses the Christian worldview may feel challenged as they read Dawkins tale of God as being jealou s. In all actuality the Biblical scriptures contained in the book of Exodus speaks of God being jealous but not in the condition of Professor Dawkins statement. By definition, Dawkins reasoning meant person that is envious of another because of his or her achievements and advantages.The dispute in Dawkins definition of jealousy and the Holy Scripture is in the interpretation of Exodus 205, which does not pertain to the sin of jealously but rather the act of giving someone else something (Worship) that only belongs to God. In closing, Professor Richard Dawkins is not a person I would choose to be a role model based on the following facts, his belief that gene manipulation will determine the outcome of human behavior as compared to my believing God created us individually without gene manipulation.Professor Dawkins stance for supporting abortion says the measuring stick should be the suffering of the fetus, mother and father, as compared to my believing God identifies with us befor e we are formed in the mothers womb. Finally, the argument that nullifies any chance that Professor Dawkins meet the qualification of serving as my role model was his characterizing God as having the same severe nature of humanity.