'Family and the Sociological Theories Essay\r'

'Since time immemorial, men adjudge been petrified by sociology. The most basic translation of sociology is the consider of humankind being affectionate behavior and radical (Alexander, 1982). Sociology largely focuses on favorable relationships and the ramifications of these relationships on peoples’ behavior. in that location need been numerous attempts to understand and ex unmingled on the face of it challenging situations in a society. These attempts constitute the divers(a) sociological systemal theories which atomic anatomy 18 ge bed towards giving business relationships to the sundry(a) phenomena in the society (Alexander, 1982). It is within the scope of this tuition to highlight on the impact of the sociological theories on the family cosmos.\r\nIntroduction\r\nsociological theories atomic number 18 sets of statements that rarityeavor to cater explanations to problems, phenomena, or human behavior (Alexander, 1982). Normally these theories are b oth explanatory and are versed with the cogency to predict predictive on some occurrences in society. Essentially much(prenominal) a hypothesis endure assist in seeing the synergy among ap invokely remote social phenomena (Turner, 2006).\r\nThe family is the basic social insane asylum and e truly(prenominal)one belongs to one. The behaviors of the divers(a)(a) family members in one family may be petrifying. There are various explanations of the various behaviors and phenomena in the family offered by the terce sociological theories (Turner, 2006).\r\nThe impacts of these behaviors as explained by the sociological theories are sort of interesting and result be studied in this study. The sociological theories in mind are the functionalism, conflict, and interactionism theories. The events of the various members in the family low smell be sufficiently summarized by the explanations offered by these theories. It is from these events that the characteristics and uses of th e various family members are based. This study will highlight the bad-tempered impact of from for each one one of theses theories on the family psychiatric hospital.\r\nMethodology\r\n miscellaneous relevant literary materials featuring research done on the subject of sociology and sociological theories are studied keenly in bid to reveal on the explanation of sociology and social behavior through the sociological theories. The data gathitherd and analyzed in the study is cautiously studied to shed some light on the interesting history in the impact of the various theories on the occurrences witnessed in the family institution. The studies did not leave bottom information which highlighted on the impact of these theories on the behaviors of item-by-item family members and how they interact.\r\nThe results are collected from these secondary sources, analyzed and presented use the trendiest of modern scientific methods. The interplay between the various sociological theories a s they impact the family institution will be highlighted in the discussion sidetrack of this study. The conclusion part of the study will involve a revaluation of the secrete of sociology and the sociological theories and the synergy between them.\r\n literary productions Review\r\nAlexander (1982) portrays sociology as a very intricate area to comprehend as it has ceaselessly being perceived by man. Sociology is perceived in the three major sociological theories. These theories postulate that the occurrences in the society can be summarized by the functionalism, conflict, and interactionism theories. winning the case of the family institution, for lesson, behaviors of the various family members and the phenomena in the family can be fully explained by the various sociological theories. jibe to the functionalism surmise, the family is an anthology of dependent parts which have a gustatory modality toward a common goal. In the selfsame(prenominal) institution there are fun ctional necessities that must be met for it to survive (Alexander, 1982).\r\nThe occurrence of some peculiar phenomena is for the suggest of serving a required function in the family (Turner, 1988). In this theory, society is equalned to a living being because both are made up of interdependent parts and systems which function in amity for the boilersuit functioning of the larger body. Most literary materials reserve that each member of the family is pivotal in the net of the victoryful family union. There are a number of criticisms of functionalism theory presented by some materials. There are several materials which view this theory as bleary and lacking in sufficient methods. Despite the event that there are a number of there a couple of materials offering criticism, this theory stands fast in explaining the phenomena (Turner, 1988).\r\nThe conflict social theory contends that individuals and groups in a given society have various amounts of resources and that the more affluent social classes and individuals use their indicant to take advantage of groups with less power (Turner, 2006). This using is largely through economics or by force. It is this disparity in the society which catalyses social disorder.\r\nIn the family scenario, the theory is portrayed in the ensuing conflicts within the family members and its serves to offer explanation that this conflict is as a consequence of social conflicts in the family institution. There are a couple of materials which portray the family institution as revolving around the conflict sentiment of sociology. In incident the essence of formation of the family is more often than not a function of the couples’ rebellion from the larger parent family (Turner, 2006).\r\nInteractionism is a sociological perspective in which human beings are surrounded by meaning(prenominal) objects and symbols. These meaningful symbols include material things, events, fellow people, associations, and even plain symbol s. These symbols are revered as superb and central in human communication.\r\nThey carry with them common social meaning that is naturally understood and adored by all members of a society (Alexander, 1982). The case of the family presents much(prenominal) a situation where the members of the families are driven by the symbols known and respected by all in that family. The fact that the family as a social institution is made in the interactionism perspective makes the unit stronger and unwavering. For instance the children look up at the prowess of the parents and this fortifies the deposit between them.\r\nResearch Findings\r\nIn summary the study revealed the following: first it was found that the various human behavior and phenomena are fully explained through the three major sociological theories (Alexander, 1982). In the family institution, functionalism theory is quite rife. It is the same theory which provides the essence of the various family members to have-to doe with being in the institution. Every member of the family is supposed(p) to play some very vital role in the attainment of the common good of the family (Turner, 1988).\r\nThe family life and phenomena is explained further by the social conflict theory. agree to this theory the occurrences and events witnessed in the family are primarily caused by the struggles against conflicts in that family. This clearly defines the reserved feelings of each of the members of the family towards each another(prenominal).\r\nThen there is the al important interactionism theory which defines largely the in built feelings of each family member. It is regarded that the family members have grounds of commonality which they look up to. to each one one of the family members is deemed to be conversant with these unwritten laws organisation the family. They al work and behave in dexterity likely to suggest that they are aiming at the same goals (Turner, 2006).\r\nResearch Discussion\r\nThis study has done atrocious work to highlight on the intriguing issue of unraveling the cause for sociology. In the family institution, the theory of functionalism makes the family come up together in the first guide (Alexander, 1982). At some age one feels that they need to have the responsibilities expected of him in the family by marrying.\r\nThose who attempt to transfigure the norm of the duo in the institution by adopting the single parent euphoria at the end of the day find it quite difficult. This follows the coming up of children since the society expects that. The parents look at the children as very important now and in their future aging age. The children depend on the parents largely for basic and other needs. This realization makes the two groups stay in harmony since they need each other (Alexander, 1982).\r\nAccording to the social conflict theory, the family comes up in the first place owing to the need of the couple to move international from shared resources (Turner, 1988). T hey start their own home and delay happily. This perspective explains the trend in divorce and such other attempts of reversing the union.\r\nThey are a consequence of the conflicts in the family. The conflicts between the children and parents define sour relations where the children in this case are said to be rumbustious and rebellious (Alexander, 1982). The society sees such groups as stupid without knowing the epicenter of the situation. Interactionism explains a great disperse the respect parents command from their children. These children perceive their parents as symbols of success and therefore form a liking for them. This perspective also explains the parents’ initiatives of introducing the children to healthy social ethics and institutions like the church and school. It is from these places where the children will learn to be answerable by heeding those generally accepted symbols (Turner, 2006).\r\nConclusions\r\nFrom the discussion in the study, the behaviors of members of the society are best explained by the sociological theories (Alexander, 1982). Therefore, it is in order to conclude the family institution is largely dependent on the perspectives of sociological theory. These theories clearly and sufficiently explain the occurrences and the behavior of the various members of the family. The failure of each member to participate in the expected responsibility is quite consequential in determining the ecstasy level derived from the institution (Turner, 1988).\r\nReferences\r\nAlexander J. (1982). Theoretical logic in sociology. Abingdon Oxford: Taylor & Francis.\r\nTurner J. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.\r\nTurner J. (2006). Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Springer.\r\n'