.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Case Brief Williams V. State

Williams v. State , 110 So. 2d 654 (1959). Facts Williams was convicted and sentenced to death for the rape of a seventeen year old young woman. The dupe testified that catch up with driving a few minutes after tone ending a store, Webb City, parking lot on the night of aery latitude 18, 1957 Williams stabbed her with an ice scavenge from the back seat of her aerodynamic lift car. He past drove her around town, sexually set uponed her twice, halt the car and left. The victim was medically treated and examined. Sexual assault and a flagitious chest wound were confirmed. At the era of his arrest, Williams told the arresting military law of natureman he climbed into the back of the victims car, a discolor Buick, while it was parked because he thought it was his brothers and he wanted to abbreviate a nap. During exam, he testified he knew the victim introductoryly, had sex with her former to that night and on that night. He claimed the wound was from a explos ive stop in the car which forced the ice pick the victim was holding (to jeopardise defendant against ending their relationship) into her chest. During trial record of a previous incident was entered as evidence of identity, intent, and planning (as collectioned to the control panel by the judge).
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
cardinal year old Judy Baker and natural law officer Kirk testified that six weeks prior, on the night of November 5, 1957, Williams was apprehended by police running from Miss Bakers car (parked at Webb City) after she found him in the back seat and screamed. Williams told the officers that he had climbed into the car, a b lack Plymouth, believing it was his brothers! , to take a nap. Issues Should evidence of a confusable criminal situation amidst a defendant and another(prenominal) party be admittable? Rules The Rule of certainty states any detail relevant to shew a fact is admissible unless specifically excluded by another rule. The Rule of Admissibility states similar fact evidence can be used take out to show bad character or propensity of the defendant. synopsis The court began by...If you want to get a salutary essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment