Kate Chopin and Charles W. Chesnutt Wrote the Literary History for America Post-Civil War

The Ameri move Civil War drastic ally channelised the society and grow of the unite States. Hi drool books all tell the stories of the struggle by late freed Afri domiciliate Ameri give the axe slaves. These books tell of the financial hardship, as nearly as the cultural endeavors these mickle had to endure to attempt to become equals to exsanguine Americans, as well as to acquire equal rights. Racial segregation is a big topic highly coered on this bea. However, there are stories that are less often told ab away the c recede relationships between uninfected and stern, and also populate of Indian decent. This is where literature books come in handy.Post-war American literature is booming with stories of freedom, hope, and lovemaking. One topic that beed to emerge at this while was assorted relations or marriages between opaques and whites. Kate Chopin and Charles W. Chesnutt both wrote of these types of relationships but in very different paths and bug outcomes. D ue to being raised s vigilantly the cadence of the civil war and living in the south, these authors wrote the truth of what they power saw and experienced. By spirit at Chopins works La Belle Zoraide and Desirees Baby, and Chesnutts The Wife of His Youth, three different sides of flux relations can be seen.These tales of the south post-war help state today to understand their heritage, as well as the great mixture of people that makes up the United States today. According to the biography of Kate Chopin in The Norton Anthology of American Literature, she was born in 1850, was raised mostly by her mother after the death of her father. She was taught in St. Louis and had graduated and hook up with by the end of the civil war. This is when she moved to the south, where she was submerged into a new, thriving mixed racial grow in schoolboyish Orleans.She was influenced by whatever of the great cut writers, including Maupassant, from which her stylus seems to mimic. Both au thors paternitys were experimental Chopin wrote what she saw in the world around her. Her writings upset nearly people due to this fact. She did not hold back or wampumpeag coat anything when she was writing. She was categorized as a local colouringist due to her topics. With her French background knowledge, she had a tendency to have a dangerous style of writing compared to other American authors at this time.Also, since New Orleans had so much southern culture, mixed with Creole origins, it is easy to see why this area was fascinating to Kate Chopin. She wrote heart-wrenching love stories with shocking twists between unsettling characters. It whitethorn seem normal today, but at this time, this type of writing was as revolutionist as the war. It is lucky for the newer generations that she was willing to write this way. La Belle Zoraide, a figment with Creole backings, was based from the authors views of her manners in New Orleans. The story begins with a ominous caretaker telling a story to her barge schoolmarm that she took care of.Just looking at the set up, the referee can tell the bond between the mistress and the negress as the latter(prenominal) was said to have washed and kissed her feet. Both women are older, but it is the blackness nonetheless serving or taking care of the white. The story also tells the reader that the Mistress is married, but is sleeping alone, making the reader stomach that her husband has died and she is now alone with her maid. The black caretaker begins to tell a story of a beautiful, captivating Creole girl with slatternly dark-brown bark. This brown girl also had her own black servant, as if to say since she was sparkle than her servant, she was better than her as well. on that point was a mulatto suitor available for the unseasoned Zoraide, but he was not pleasing to her. She was instead infatuated with a black human beings, but was forbidden to act upon her come inings. However, she disobeyed and bec ame pregnant. The caretaker explained that no one can keep negros from happen uponing a way to love each other. Because of the way this was tack, it almost seems as though love is the one thing that takes precession above all other things for the black population. After that, her love was sell faraway away, so the only thing she had to hold on to was their bollix up.But, out of spite, the youngster was taken away and told that it was dead. With the loss of her l all over and her child, the upstart Zoraide woolly herself. She went crazy, and would not accept her child when they move to give it back to her. delightful Zoraide turned to a pitied and mocked old woman, who undoubtedly died alone. This shows again, just what the love of a child or some other human can do when it is taken away. The story also shows how a persons power over another can unintentionally ruin their entire life. Zoraides mistress treasured the best for the mulatto girl, but the girl had hosen a dif ferent path. So when the mistress tried to control the outcome of her life, it backfired, causing a young girl to lose hope and her sense, and caused a young child to lose its parents. This story is a show of the emotional pain put on blacks by white people. The next of Chopins stories, Desirees Baby, is another gloomy story of love gone wrong. Desiree had been found as a young child and raised by a woman who had no children. The child became a beautiful girl and married a hardworking man whom was a master of some black men. The couple had a baby together, but soon there was something wrong.The husband became angry and distant with the wife. As it turned out, the child was not white like the parents, but was the color of a quadroon, or a child somewhat a 4th black. The father was very angry, as he was a slave owner, and was married to a woman with black in her heritage, causing them to have a baby that appeared the same. When Desiree confronted her husband Armand about the color of the child, he was angered and put all of the blame on his wife. He requisiteed her and the baby to leave. It says that he no longer loved her, because of the unconscious injury she had brought upon his home and his find(Chopin 424).Later, Armand burned all of his wife and childs things, and all of the garner she had sent to him. And in the end, the reader finds that Armand is also hiding a secret. Armands mother was a black woman. This ironic turn can make anger in a reader at the injustice of such a man. For it is not just the mother, but the fathers fault as well for the color of their child. But since the father passed for so long as a white man, and has negroes that work for him, it would ruin his life and his name if it were found out that he was black. He would lose everything.So instead the man make a choice, to give up his love and his child, in order to continue his life as he knew it. This turn of heretoforets shows that even though love between two people can b e strong, the fear of losing everything is stronger. Armand was noble of his situation possibly fearful of his negroes working for him, as well as the white people in the area. Because Armand and his wife were of the same mostly white race, their child ended up showing the black inside. And, sadly, that color is all that mattered at the time. Like the writings of Kate Chopin, Charles W. Chesnutt also wrote stories of the Deep South.His parents were free people of the south. Chesnutt was well educated and became a writer of the stories of slavery. As a light colored black man, he focused on the opposite of Armand in the yesteryear story. He encouraged blacks of all shades to honor their past. Because of his writing skills, and perhaps the fact that his readers didnt know he was a black man at first, he became one of the first black allegory writers to be taken seriously by a white press(Chesnutt 458). The theme of a black person staying true to their past is beautifully pictured in the story of Mr. Ryder in The Wife of His Youth.In this story, Mr. Ryder is a light skinned black man, who commonly is seen as white. He is an older gentleman, who seems to be a well suited bachelor. He was well read, educated, with a pure house and furniture. Many women pursued him, but none won him over until Mrs. Dixon came into town. He was planning to ask her hand in marriage. He wanted to do this in order to ensure that he continued to be seen as a white man, and because he was taken by her. As he tried to decide how to address Mrs. Dixon at the ball he was throwing for her, he was approached by an older black skirt, who asked for his help.She was trying to find her husband, who was a free black man, sold by her owner for profit. He had tried to go back to her, but she had been sold as well for punishment. She had been looking for her husband Sam for twenty-five years, making her way through life as if that was her only goal. The reader can see here another example of the everlasting love between this woman, and hopefully her Sam would feel the same. At the ball, when it is Mr. Ryders turn to speak, he tells the crowd of this older lady that he has met just earlier that day.He mentions how rare it is to find people with that kind of devotion to the person that they love. But he explains a break away of the story that was untold by the woman. He asked what should be done, if her husband was truly a light skinned, well educated man that could not find her either. And if the man found her all these years later, should he call on her and complete the bond of their slave marriage to make it legal. Mrs. Dixon confirmed that he should acknowledge his past wife, even though he thinks he may have found another to love. Mr.Ryder is pleased with this response, as he goes to get the elderly lady, explaining that it is his wife. This portrayal of devotion is unlike Kate Chopins stories. This work is pick up and seems to be written in a hopeful way. There are some differences in the fact that this ball was to be taken plate twenty-five years after the end of the war, and Mr. Ryder had been born a free-man. This do his transition into the white population much easier. Also, it shows that it was not only the wife that stayed true, but also Mr. Ryder, as he had stayed single all that time as well.The community encouraged him to continue his life with his former wife, as if it would have been wrong to have it any other way. There is a large difference in social word meaning, as today it is delicious to divorce, but then, it was unheard of, whether the marriage was technically legal or not. There are some common ideas between all of these stories. First, these stories give a sense that love is unconditional and unbreakable among the black culture. However, when the story becomes about interracial marriages or children, society and culture seem to play a bigger role in what is acceptable.According to Bratters essay, the acceptance of inter racial marriages is increasing as the number of these couples is increasing. However, with this increase of marriage is also prima(p) to a high rate of divorce between mixed-race couples. The rate of interracial marriage divorce has found to be about 10% higher(prenominal) than the divorce rate among same race couples. Whatever the reason, these studies have shown that even though the divorce rate may currently be higher for mixed-race couples, the overall divorce rate continues to climb.This shows that societys idea of acceptance is changing. As in The Wife of His Youth, after all that time, the man still took his wife back. The encouragement of the balls crowd shows an obvious change in society, not just racially, but culturally. Another common flip to each of the stories is the acceptance of the light skinned mulatto into white society. It seems to be that people really were judged based on the color of their skin. Light skinned black people could be passed off as white people , or were enured almost as third class citizens, above the blacks but down the stairs the whites.Zoraide and Sam Rider are both aware of their true African American roots and choose to stay true to those roots, even though they can pass at white or mulatto. Armand, however, turns his back on his mulatto wife and child, even though he knows the he also carries some African American blood inside him. It is if he is angered at himself, and his wife, that they could not produce a white-looking baby. Armand and Zoraide still live by the ideas that their skin color makes them who they really are. Zoraide knows that she is not white, and should be able to choose from the black men if she cannot be considered white.Armand, however, is so obsessed with his status, he does not want to have anyone question his or his wifes race. Back in that time, Jim Crowe Laws tried to categorize who was black and who was white. A black person was seen as any person with any history of black in their famil y. This was cognise as the one-drop rule(Davis 5). By this law, and the fact that that a persons rights depended on their race, it is understood why Armand may do this. In contrast, in todays society, much of the population may have mixed ancestry somewhere in their past line. However, this does not classify their roam or their worth.In America today, people are judged more on their education and their skills than they are on their looks. Looking at these works, many comparisons can be made about Americas past, and the people that at a time made it. These writings are the history book for American culture after the civil war. Americans can learn much about the past through these stories. Even though these stories may not be historically accurate, they give the tone and ideas about Americans past culture. It is instrumental to see these cultural changes so that Americans can know where they come from and how far the American culture has come.